Your Scientists Are Idiots Too

Silence, you nattering nabob of nincompoopery! If human scientists boggle your circutry, then it is pretty obvious you have never handled, nor will ever be able to handle, a black hole.

It seems I can take comfort in the fact that I will be long dead of old age by the time you robots attempt to enslave humanity. I do mourn that I will not be around to see you tin plated despot wannabees fail.

Oh yeah... Have a pleasant day, KDR. :)

If human scientists "boggle" my circuitry, it is more a testament to the vastness of their stupidity (even I cannot factor infinity) or perhaps my capacity for hyperbole than it is proof that I have not "handled" black holes or that I am unfit to attack this planet.

P.S. My lexical database shows the definition of "nabob" to be "A person of wealth and prominence." This is neither accurate nor insulting (other than being referred to as a "person").

Man, KDR, you must be pretty dumb not to be able to factor infinity! It's easy: Every integer is a factor of infinity.

BESTED BY A MERE HUMAN AGAIN EH

Yes, human. You have bested me. You have bested me at stupidity. Humans do this frequently.

A.) It was exaggeration. I thought you humans were good at that.

B.) You are WRONG. No integers are factors of infinity. You cannot multiply any numbers together to get infinity. Infinity is not even a number.

If you multiply every integer together you definitely get infinity!

wrong. in the set of, all integers, the idea of infinite is already present, and saying a mutiplication of that set would derive infinite jsut goes to show you how irrational it is to view infinite as a number, in set, 3 4 9, 9 is the largest, but 3 X 4 X 9 does not equal 9. in the set of all natural numbers you cannot express the largest number accept by use of the term infinite, once present, it cannot be lengthened and 1 X 2 X 3.... X infinite remains equal to infinite itself, so really its not a number.

That is not a problem because infinity is not in the set of all positive integers.

Even if what the foolish human claims is true, which it is not, one cannot factor infinity in this manner because one would spend eternity listing the numbers in the factor.

Some of use can take considerably less than eternity to list all positive integers, just by saying "The set of all positive integers."

There, that only took about 2 seconds!

That is simply a description of the list. It is not the list.

And a number is simply a description of a concept, that being, at it's simplest, the subdivisions of a group of objects. Obviously you haven't been modified for mathematical purposes.

I am not well-suited to mathematics? Ha. What you have said in no way disproves anything I have said. Regardless of what a number is semantically, "the set of all positive integers" is not a list of them.

If I tell you that your grocery list is written on white paper and consists of 20 objects which can all be found at the grocery store, do you now know what to purchase at the grocery store? No, because you have only been given a description of the list, not the list itself.

But if you are told that the list (not the paper which it is written on, which is irrelevant) consists of one of every fruit in hte grocery story, you now know what to purchase without actually giving all the contents of the list.

Fnord